In the era of the knowledge-based economy, technology has become the cornerstone of national competitiveness. In late 2003, during the Fourth Plenary Session of the Eighth Central Committee of the Communist Party of China in Shanghai, the "Strategic Outline for Implementing the Strategy of Revitalizing Cities through Science and Education in Shanghai" was reviewed and adopted, marking the official establishment of a science- and education-driven development strategy for the city. Innovation is at the heart of this strategy, serving as the key driver behind Shanghai's efforts to modernize and elevate its economic standing.
From 1993 to 2002, the contribution of science and technology to Shanghai’s economic growth rose from 33% to 53.08%, while the share of high-tech industrial output in total industrial output increased from 15.45% to 23.4%. Despite these improvements, the city’s research and innovation capabilities did not see significant progress. This was largely due to the heavy reliance on high-intensity investment rather than true innovation, particularly independent innovation, which failed to drive the current wave of technological advancement.
Historically, countries like those in Southeast Asia and Latin America once dominated the global economy but eventually faced financial crises and structural challenges, often referred to as the “Latin American disease.†The root cause was their neglect of scientific, talent, and institutional innovation, which left them trapped in the low-end segment of global value chains. This serves as a cautionary tale for China, highlighting the importance of building a sustainable innovation ecosystem.
China's automotive industry is a prime example of this challenge. With over 5,800 production enterprises and total assets exceeding RMB 1 trillion, the sector has seen impressive growth. In 2004, domestic car output reached 5.07 million units, with the industry's total output value surpassing 1.1 trillion yuan. However, despite this expansion, most companies rely on a model of “introduction, imitation, and absorption,†lacking truly original technologies and intellectual property. While this approach worked when the market was closed, it is no longer sufficient in an increasingly globalized world where international competition is intensifying.
The saying goes: third-tier companies produce products, second-tier companies build brands, and first-tier companies set standards. China, as a major producer and consumer of cars, remains stuck at the product level. There are few real Chinese brands, and even fewer in terms of R&D and technical standards. Key components such as engines and chassis remain dependent on foreign technology, making it difficult for Chinese cars to compete globally.
With the reduction of tariffs and non-tariff barriers, Chinese vehicles are entering international markets more frequently, leading to potential trade disputes with major trading partners. Additionally, the impact of certain WTO regulations will soon become more pronounced, further testing the resilience of the domestic industry.
To address these challenges, some visionaries in China have recognized the need for independent innovation. Over the past three years, domestic brands have grown significantly, increasing their market share from 5% to 20%. This progress shows that the future of Chinese automobiles lies in developing strong, independent brands, advanced technologies, and intellectual property rights.
While the global automotive giants—often referred to as the “6+3†group—have entered the Chinese market, they have left little room for indigenous brand development. The old model of relying on extensive investment for growth is no longer viable. Many joint ventures are now struggling due to underinvestment in R&D and innovation. As competition intensifies and consumer awareness grows, Chinese automakers must continue to invest heavily in research and development to secure their future.
Moreover, with energy resources becoming scarcer, new energy vehicles have emerged as a shared goal among global automotive leaders. Although China lags about 20 years behind in traditional automotive technology, it is only five years behind in the field of new energy. This presents a unique opportunity for Chinese automakers to catch up by investing more in R&D and innovation. By doing so, they can overcome their technological disadvantages and improve their position in the global division of labor.
Drymix Mortar admixtures has wide range of products, including HPMC, MHEC, RDP, HPS, PVA.
Drymix Mortar Admixtures,Calcium Formate,Lignocellulose,Potassium Formate
Santo Chemical Limited , https://www.santchem.com