China's mechanical base industry has long been characterized by a weak foundation, limited investment, and insufficient development. Although the country recognizes the critical role of mechanical components in the broader machinery sector, historical underinvestment has left the industry with a fragile structure and low technical capabilities. As China's host equipment becomes more advanced, the lagging performance of basic components has become increasingly evident. While the government has provided some support through technology introduction, industrial upgrading, and R&D initiatives, these efforts still fall short compared to both domestic demand and international standards.
Currently, the variety and quality of China's mechanical base products are inadequate. High-end components remain heavily reliant on imports, as domestic offerings struggle to meet the performance requirements of modern machinery. The performance of key components is roughly comparable to foreign standards from the 1980s, and issues such as unstable quality, high early failure rates, and poor reliability continue to plague the industry. As a result, many original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) opt for imported parts, further reducing the market share of domestically produced components, especially those with lower technological content.
Despite some success in exporting labor-intensive, low-value products, China's basic parts industry still lacks high-tech, value-added solutions. This limits its ability to compete globally and capture higher-margin markets.
At present, the industry faces several major challenges:
First, there is serious overcapacity and low specialization. Many enterprises operate at small scales, lacking the economic efficiency needed to thrive. This results in fragmented production, limited economies of scale, and poor overall performance. For example, the total bearing capacity of China’s top three bearing companies is less than that of a single foreign firm. Similarly, numerous hydraulic component factories have been built, but few achieve significant output levels. In contrast, global leaders like Germany’s Rexroth and Japan’s Yau Institute produce millions of units annually.
Second, research and development (R&D) capabilities are weak, with insufficient capital and slow technological progress. Although China introduced foreign technologies in the late 1970s and early 1980s, it failed to invest adequately in their digestion and improvement. The ratio of technology import to R&D investment should ideally be around 1:7, but China has lagged in this area. Meanwhile, foreign companies invest heavily in R&D—often 4–5% of sales—and maintain a competitive edge. Domestic academic institutions often produce high-level research, but the gap between theory and practical application remains wide.
Third, outdated raw materials and production technologies hinder development. Poor-quality steel and limited specifications affect the performance of fasteners, bearings, and molds. Additionally, the lack of advanced processing equipment and automation limits efficiency and precision. In many cases, Chinese enterprises are unable to afford or implement modern production lines, which further undermines product quality.
The root causes of these problems include weak corporate foundations and insufficient policy support. The industry lacks strong R&D capabilities, and the government has not yet implemented comprehensive policies to foster growth. While some sectors, such as molds, have received attention, the support is narrow and limited in impact.
To address these challenges, the future of China's mechanical base industry will likely involve restructuring, resource integration, and the elimination of inefficient enterprises. Over the next five to ten years, the industry must focus on developing branded products, enhancing innovation, improving competitiveness, and adopting more efficient management practices. Only then can it truly meet the growing demands of China's machinery sector and compete on the global stage.
SG2 mig copper coating Welding Wire
(1) SG2 Welding wire has the following advantages:
1. Low welding cost: its cost is only 40~50% of that of submerged arc welding and manual arc welding.
2. High production efficiency: its productivity is 1 to 4 times that of manual arc welding.
3. Easy to operate: open arc, unlimited thickness of workpiece, all-position welding and downward welding.
4. High crack resistance of the weld: the weld has low hydrogen and less nitrogen content.
Sg2 Mig Copper Coating Welding Wire,Copper Coated Welding Wire
Jiangyin Vankey Machinery Technology Co.,Ltd , https://www.wkweldingwire.com